Reconstructing the Distinctive Paradigm of Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah and Maqāṣid al-Qur’ān: A Genealogical Inquiry and Its Contemporary Relevance
VOLUME 23, 2026
The Role of Targeted Infra-popliteal Endovascular Angioplasty to Treat Diabetic Foot Ulcers Using the Angiosome Model: A Systematic Review
VOLUME 6, 2023
Intihaul Fudola, Achmad Fuaddin, Ummi Hasanah, Tiara Nur Mulyawati, Fahmia Nuha Tsabita, Shafira Munawaroh Dahlan, Saichul Anam, Muhammad Kanzul Fikri and Diki Mashuri Candra
Abstract
Contemporary discourse in Islamic legal studies (uṣūl al-fiqh) and exegesis faces a growing methodological dichotomy between the legalistic Maqasid Syari’ah (MS) and the ethically-universal Maqasid Al-Qur’an (MQ). This study aims to explore the paradigmatic distinction, scope, and fundamental function of these two concepts. The methodology employed is a qualitative-analytical approach, grounded in an extensive literature review. Specifically, the research applies genealogical analysis to trace the historical development of MQ, combined with a critical-comparative analysis of key classical works of Uṣūl al-Fiqh and the modern thought of MQ scholars. The findings reveal a significant distinctive conclusion: MS is identified as a historically legalistic-normative paradigm with a partial scope, focusing primarily on the preservation of the five essential needs (al-daruriyyat al-khams) through the inductive method (istiqrā’) based on fiqh rulings. Conversely, MQ is identified as an ethical-moral paradigm with a universal scope (kulliyyat), utilizing a systemic-holistic method to realize the macro-objectives of the Qur’an, such as justice (al-’adl) and human dignity (qīmah insāniyyah).
Keywords :
Maqasid Syari’ah, Maqasid Al-Qur’an, Genealogical Analysis, Paradigmatic Distinction, Universal Ethics..
Erin Saricilar
Lecture in accounting. University of Basrah, College of Administration and Economics, Department of Accounting.
Lecture in accounting. University of Basrah, College of Administration and Economics, Department of Accounting.
Abstract
Atherosclerotic disease significantly impacts patients with type 2 diabetes, who often present with recalcitrant peripheral ulcers. The angiosome model of the foot presents an opportunity to perform direct angiosome-targeted endovascular interventions to maximise both wound healing and limb salvage. A systematic review was performed, with 17 studies included in the final review. Below-the-knee endovascular interventions present significant technical challenges, with technical success depending on the length of lesion being treated and the number of angiosomes that require treatment. Wound healing was significantly improved with direct angiosome-targeted angioplasty, as was limb salvage, with a significant increase in survival without major amputation. Indirect angioplasty, where the intervention is applied to collateral vessels to the angiosomes, yielded similar results to direct angiosome-targeted angioplasty. Applying the angiosome model of the foot in direct angiosome-targeted angioplasty improves outcomes for patients with recalcitrant diabetic foot ulcers in terms of primary wound healing, mean time for complete wound healing and major amputation-free survival.
Keywords :
Diabetic foot ulcer, angiosome, angioplasty